Showing posts with label Serving God. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Serving God. Show all posts

“Go to the village ahead of you, and at once you will ...” (Matthew 21:2-3)

As they approached Jerusalem and came to Bethphage on the Mount of Olives, Jesus sent two disciples, saying to them, "Go to the village ahead of you, and at once you will find a donkey tied there, with her colt by her. Untie them and bring them to me. If anyone says anything to you, say that the Lord needs them, and he will send them right away." (Matthew 21:1-3)

Who is 'the Lord' that Jesus refers to?

Most assume that Jesus was referring to himself when he said “the Lord.” And certainly, many of Jesus' followers did greet Jesus as “lord.

But would Jesus have referred to himself in that manner? Would he have instructed his disciples to refer to him as “the Lord.”?

Both uses of this word, "Lord" or "lord" come from the same Greek word κύριος (kyrios). According to Thayer's lexicon, this Greek word can refer both to "a title of honor expressive of respect and reverence, with which servants greet their master;" as well as a "title given to God."

Jesus never proclaimed to be “the Lord.”. Nor did he ever refer to himself as "Lord." He referred to God with the term "Lord":
Jesus said to him, “Away from me, Satan! For it is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.’” (Matthew 4:10)

“The most important one,” answered Jesus, “is this: ‘Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’" (Mark 12:30)

“The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free (Luke 4:18)

He told them, “The harvest is plentiful, but the workers are few. Ask the Lord of the harvest, therefore, to send out workers into his harvest field." (Luke 10:2)
Yes, we do find instances where followers of Jesus referred to Jesus as "lord." Not Jesus. Jesus never referred to himself as Lord.

So we find there is no evidence that Jesus would have instructed his followers to refer to himself as "the Lord." Yet he knew that because he was doing the work of God, he could tell them that the donkey was for "the Lord." This is because Jesus saw himself as the servant of the Lord God.

Did Jesus see himself as a servant or a 'lord'?

Multiple times, Jesus proclaimed himself to be a loving servant (υἱός) of “the Lord” God. He also prayed to the Lord God asking to do God's will, and taught that we should do God's will:
“My Father, if it is not possible for this cup to be taken away unless I drink it, may your will be done.” (Matthew 26:42)

“Abba, Father,” he said, “everything is possible for you. Take this cup from me. Yet not what I will, but what you will.” (Mark 14:36)


"For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of Him who sent me." (John 6:38)

For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.” (Matthew 12:49-50)

"By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but Him who sent me." (John 5:30)
Thus God was ultimately Jesus' Lord, as God is Lord to every prophet in the Old Testament, and Lord to each of us.

Thus it would be correct to interpret that Jesus was going to be using the donkey to serve his Lord God. And those he instructed to get the donkey were also serving God by following Jesus' instructions.

Why is this important? It is important because this is how the loving servant of God engages his followers in the service of God.

Is God a person?

This is also important because the Supreme Being is not some vague force or void. God is a Person. Only a person can have a will, and be served and pleased. A vague force or cloud cannot have a will. A vague force or cloud cannot be pleased with someone's service.

Jesus taught and showed with his life that God is a Person we can love and serve, and care for. God is a lovable, beautiful, and compassionate Person. He is the Perfect Person we are continuously looking for. He is the Person who will never abuse us or take us for granted.

In addition, the Supreme Being is the Person we can always count on. He is the Person we are looking for when we expect others to be good. He is the Person we are looking for when we are disappointed in others. He is the Person we are looking for when we are heartbroken by a former girlfriend, boyfriend, or spouse. He is the Person we are looking for when we seek the admiration and respect from others. He is the Person we are looking for when we are lonely.

What does 'comes in the name of the Lord' mean?

It is notable to mention also that as Jesus went through the streets of Jerusalem, his followers were shouting:
The crowds that went ahead of him and those that followed shouted, “Hosanna to the Son of David!” “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!” “Hosanna in the highest heaven!” (Matthew 21:9)
In all four Gospels we find that Jesus' followers referred to God as "Lord" as they praised Jesus:
“Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!” (Matt. 23:39, Mark 11:9, Luke 12:35, John 12:13)
Yes this indicates that 'Lord' in this context is referring to God. But this praise also indicates that Jesus' followers recognized that one of Jesus’ central missions was to teach the power of the Name of God. Otherwise, why would people be shouting that verse drawn from David's Psalm 118?
Blessed is he who comes in the name of the LORD. (Psalm 118:26)
Jesus also taught the importance of glorifying God's Holy Names:
“This, then, is how you should pray: “ ‘Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name ... ' " (Matthew 6:9)
And consider this text about Jesus and his disciples:
When they had sung a hymn, they went out to the Mount of Olives. (Matthew 26:30)
So we know from this that Jesus, regularly led his students in singing hymns. And what is a hymn? A hymn is the praising of God and His Names, as exemplified by David's Psalms:
“Rejoice in the LORD, you who are righteous, and praise His Holy Name.” (Psalms 97:12)
and
“In Him our hearts rejoice, for we trust in His Holy Name.” (Psalms 33:21) 

“ ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart ...” (Matthew 22:37-38)

“ ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment.” (Matt. 22:37-38)

Is this another trap for Jesus?

Jesus' statement comes in reply to Pharisees who were trying to trap Jesus with the question:
“Teacher, which is the greatest commandment of the Law?” (Matthew 22:36)
These temple priests were trying to find fault in Jesus. They were trying to trick him into saying something that was contradictory to their teachings, so they could accuse Jesus of blasphemy and persecute him.

But for Jesus, their question provided the opportunity to clarify his mission and his teachings. Furthermore, Jesus' answer provides for us the compass with which we can steer our lives by.

Was this the primary teaching of Moses too?

Notice that Jesus’ statement is quoting the prime teaching of Moses. His statement is derived from this central teaching by Moses:
"Love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength." (Deuteronomy 6:5)
This teaching of Moses and Jesus focuses on the importance of having a heartfelt and personal relationship with God. It also de-emphasizes many of the mundane rituals that were the focus of the temple teachers Jesus was speaking to.

Despite that focus on rituals by the Pharisees, we find that love of God was the primary instruction of Moses. In addition to his statement above, we find similar instructions throughout Moses' teachings:
"Love the LORD your God and keep His requirements, His decrees, His laws and His commands always." (Deut. 11:1)

"So if you faithfully obey the commands I am giving you today—to love the LORD your God and to serve Him with all your heart and with all your soul" (Deut. 11:13)

"If you carefully observe all these commands I am giving you to follow—to love the LORD your God, to walk in obedience to Him and to hold fast to Him" (Deut 11:22)

"because you carefully follow all these laws I command you today—to love the LORD your God and to walk always in obedience to Him—" (Deut. 19:9)

"For I command you today to love the LORD your God, to walk in obedience to Him, and to keep His commands, decrees and laws" (Deut. 30:16)

"and that you may love the LORD your God, listen to his voice, and hold fast to him. For the LORD is your life" (Deut. 30:20)
The fact that Jesus drew this most important teaching from the teachings of Moses - one of God's messengers (or Prophets) - is important. Jesus is giving precisely the same instructions that were given by Moses and other messengers of God. This is evidenced by the teaching of Joshua, a follower of Moses after he had passed:
"But be very careful to keep the commandment and the law that Moses the servant of the LORD gave you: to love the LORD your God, to walk in all His ways, to obey His commands, to hold fast to Him and to serve Him with all your heart and all your soul." (Joshua 22:5)

So be very careful to love the LORD your God. (Joshua 23:11)
We also find that David taught love of God:
Love the LORD, all his faithful people! (Psalm 31:23)
In addition to other Prophets, Moses, Joshua, David and Jesus were all passing down the same clear message from God. They are giving us the single takeaway point from all of the teachings of scriptures and all of the Prophets.

What about fearing God?

We also find in most translations of the Old Testament a number of verses attributed to Prophets suggesting that we should fear God. How can we love someone we fear?

In most of these verses, "fear" is a mistranslation. In these verses, the word "fear" has been translated from the Hebrew word יָרֵא (yare'). This word, according to Strong's lexicon, can also mean "to stand in awe of, be awed" and "reverence, honor, respect."

Certainly, we cannot love someone we fear. But we can love someone that we are in awe of. We can love someone that we revere. And we can love someone that we honor, and respect.

Therefore, the appropriate translation for the Hebrew word יָרֵא (yare') in the context of the Old Testament teachings about God is to honor God, or revere God - not fear God.

And certainly, to be awed by God - because the Supreme Being is truly awesome.

Is there a difference between salvationism and love for God?

We can thus gauge and measure the doctrines of various teachers and institutions by this instruction. Are they teaching love for God, or are they teaching salvationism?

Salvationism is the philosophy whereby a person worships Jesus or God for the sole purpose of becoming saved. Today many institutions teach salvationism.

Contrary to love of God, salvationism is a self-centered philosophy. Salvationism is not love for God because it is focused on saving me. As such, it is actually the opposite of love for God.

A person who loves God doesn't care about being saved. A true lover of God cares about pleasing God. They could care less about whether they are saved or not.

This is what "love" means, Love means to care for the happiness of another. Love is the opposite of self-centeredness. When we love someone else, we care about that other person's happiness more than our own. 

Indeed, focusing upon our own salvation is not love. Love means to put someone else's interests above our own.

What does loving God mean?

Loving God means caring about what God wants, and putting what God wants above what we may want. And we can know by Jesus' and Moses' instruction that God wants our love. He wants us to establish a loving relationship with Him.

This means that loving God requires us to accept that God is a Person. Why? Because we cannot love an impersonal object, whether it be a burning bush, a thundering voice, a void, or a vague force. Love can only be given to a person because love means we care about that person as we might care about ourselves - and each of us is, indeed, a person.

Loving God, then, means first understanding that God is a Person. Then it requires reaching out to God and coming to know God. Once we come to know God, we discover what pleases Him. 

We have to know a person in order to love them. We also have to know a person before we can know what pleases them.

What does 'all your heart' mean?

Jesus and Moses' instruction is clarifying not only that we should love God, but that we should love God with all our heart, soul and mind. What does the word "all" mean here?

Let's use an analogy. Let's say a soccer player is looking up in the stands at his girlfriend for a minute, just before he is passed the ball. The distraction will prevent him from getting the ball and moving it forward, right?

In the same way, Jesus and Moses are asking us to love God with all of our hearts. This means without distraction to the degree possible. In the beginning, this means our focus should be upon coming to know God and establishing a personal relationship with Him. As we progress in coming to know God personally, we will naturally fall in love with God. 

This is because we are connected to God. We come from Him. He is our closest family member. It is natural that we love our closest family member, because we are intimately related.

We also need the Supreme Person. We need His love and we need to love Him.

This is why there is so much loneliness, depression, and anxiety in the world. These come from forgetting our connection with God.

When we truly reconnect with God we naturally come to love Him because He is the Perfect Person. He is naturally loveable. He is everything we seek when it comes to having a relationship with someone. 

Once we establish this sort of loving relationship with God, naturally our focus will more and more be upon making Him happy. Our loving relationship with God will thus naturally divert our focus from making ourselves happy, and our focus will be upon pleasing God.

Does love make us happy?

This is the irony about love: When we love someone we are wanting to make them happy. But because we are creatures of love, loving also makes us happy.

This is more specific when our love is aimed at God. We do get a glimpse of this happiness when we love another person or family member. But the full breadth of fulfillment comes when we love God and all of God's children (that is, everyone).

Because loving and pleasing God is our natural constitution, and we are spiritually connected with Him, we will naturally be fulfilled when we love Him with all our hearts.

And this is also why wealth, possessions, power, and authority do not fulfill us. We might try so hard to make ourselves happy with material things, and yet we still feel empty. 

This is why even the most famous and wealthy people will still put so much attention (focus) on their spouse, children, and/or pets. They have found that their fame and wealth don't fulfill them.

It is only when we begin to love another that we begin to have a glimpse of real happiness. Jesus confirmed this when he said:
“Not everyone who says to me ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.” (Matthew 7:21)
Love of God is the 'kingdom of heaven.'

Why is love fulfilling?

Why do we feel happier when we care about and act on behalf of someone other than ourselves?

Because by nature we are loving servants. Our natural constitution is to love and serve our beloved. We were specifically created by the Supreme Being for this purpose: To love and serve Him in partnership with His associates. This is our natural position.

This also means that we are lovers by nature. We are not kings, or champions, or moguls, or conquerors. These may be roles that we play on earth temporarily, until our bodies get old and die. God is the real king, the champion, and so on. And our natural role is to help Him. 

When we love and serve the Supreme Being, we become completely fulfilled. When we try to enjoy for ourselves, we feel empty.

Notice how Joshua says above, "we must be careful." Being careful means staying vigilant. Just think of a parent of a baby. In order to keep the baby safe and healthy, the parent must stay vigilant. When their attention is diverted, they must try to bring it back to focus on the baby. 

In the same way, when we find ourselves diverting from our focus upon pleasing God and onto our self-centered concerns, we must realize this and bring our focus back to the Supreme Being.

The facilities for doing this are praying to God, praising God, offering to God, and working for God. 

These are all facilities that Moses, Jesus, and all the Prophets taught for trying to focus our lives more and more upon our relationship with God. By doing these things we gradually reconnect with the Supreme Being.

As our love for God grows, we become focused upon pleasing Him, and our focus is naturally taken away from ourselves. Furthermore, when that focus upon loving and pleasing God brings us more happiness than our self-centered activities, we begin to want to do more things that please God. In other words, as our love for God grows, we become more attracted to the things that please God than the things that please ourselves.

It is a natural process, which Jesus, Moses, and all the Prophets taught.

Can someone be forced to love God?

We were created to love and serve God. But love requires freedom. We cannot be forced to love. Love requires the freedom to love or not love. To care or not care.

This is why God gives us the freedom to love Him or not. This is also why we cannot see God with our physical eyes: God has put us in a temporary physical world where we can't see Him because we at some point in the past chose not to love God.

So God, being the loving, kind Person that He is, gave us the freedom we wanted. He is allowing us to make our own decision about whether we want to love Him or not. Should we decide we want to re-establish our relationship with God, He will begin to gradually show Himself to us - according to the extent of our desire to be with Him.

God also encourages us to re-establish our loving relationship with Him by sending His messengers like Moses and Jesus to tell us so. But notice that they did not try to force their followers to love God. They encouraged love of God.

This is because God wants us to be happy - because He loves us unconditionally. Whether we love Him or not, God loves us.

Did Jesus love God?

Jesus illustrated his love for God throughout his mission. His entire teachings were focused on reconnecting with God.

But his love for God was most prominent when he prayed to God:
"My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me. Yet not as I will, but as You will." (Matthew 26:39)


"The greatest among you will be your servant ..." (Matthew 23:11-12)

"The greatest among you will be your servant. For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted." (Matthew 23:11-12)
Jesus is continuing to address his followers. This statement follows this one:
"Everything they do is done for people to see: They make their phylacteries wide and the tassels on their garments long; they love the place of honor at banquets and the most important seats in the synagogues; they love to be greeted with respect in the marketplaces and to be called 'Rabbi' by others. But you are not to be called 'Rabbi,' for you have one Teacher, and you are all brothers. And do not call anyone on earth 'father,' for you have one Father, and He is in heaven. Nor are you to be called instructors, for you have one Instructor, the Messiah." (Matthew 23:8-10)

Why is Jesus talking about 'the greatest'?

The topic Jesus is turning to regards the desire to be the "greatest" - translated from the Greek word μείζων (meizōn). Why?

Because those who often claim the position of teacher (or rabbi - as a temple teacher during Jesus times' was referred to) often see themselves as being great. They seek the role of teacher in order to have some authority over others. This is despite the reality that the role of teacher is one of responsibility.

Though his words can be applied generally, Jesus is speaking of the temple priests and Pharisees. The phylacteries were small boxes wore on part of the body that held portions of scripture. Those with larger phylacteries were more respected. 

Jesus had previously responded to a similar question posed by his disciples:
At that time the disciples came to Jesus and asked, “Who, then, is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?” (Matthew 18:1)
To which Jesus had replied similarly:
“I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore, whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven." (Matthew 18:3-4)
This answer, similarly, related to becoming humble - like a child - or here a servant.

In this case, Jesus was advising his followers not to take this course. He doesn't want them to struggle for the position of being seen as great by others. He doesn't want them to see authority and power.

This is because Jesus knows it will not make them happy - and it will lead to misleading others.

'Servant' of whom?

The word "servant" in Jesus' statement is being translated from the Greek word διάκονος (diakonos) which means "one who executes the commands of another, especially of a master - a servant, attendant, minister."

Jesus is teaching that we are all created by God to be His loving servants. This is our natural position. None of us are masters.

Yet look around. We see practically everywhere, including in us, the desire to be famous, respected, admired, and have authority over others. We see that practically everyone around us is striving to become famous, wealthy, powerful, and thus have authority. Why are we all striving to be the greatest?

Let's go back to the part that God created us to be His loving servants. Love requires freedom. Without freedom, there is no such thing as love. In other words, we have to choose whether we want to love and serve the Supreme Being. Otherwise, we would simply be slaves or robots.

So while the Supreme Being created us as His loving servants, He also gave us the ability to choose between loving and serving Him; or serving someone else or serving ourselves.

Will serving ourselves make us happy?

This is the assumption of the physical world. The world tells us that if we focus on ourselves - if we see ourselves as the great and as the center of the universe - we will become happy. We will become fulfilled.

Actually, the opposite is true. Self-focus yields emptiness.

Each of us was created to love. We were created to love each other and love the Supreme Being. God is full of love and He created beings that need love to survive.

This is why we see that children who are not given love when they are babies become hostile. This is why we seek the attention and admiration of others. This is why we spend our lives seeking a soul mate. We are made to love. We need love.

The problem is that because we were made to love, we seek love at every turn. If we don't give love then we want others to love us in whatever manner we can. When this is colored by materialism, we think that if we gain fame or authority, others will love us. But because others aren't really loving famous people in the physical world (mostly envy) we are left empty. This leaves us with an insatiable desire to become complete. This we try to achieve through greed and self-centered activity.

So why is it that there are so few people around us who choose to love and serve God? This is because this physical world is the place the Supreme Being set up for those who do not want to love and serve Him. This is a temporary place set up to teach us one lesson after another, in hopes that we will have a change of heart.

We might compare this physical world to those traveling carnivals that set up for a few weeks once a year outside a town. They set up their rides, the big Ferris wheel, amusement games, clowns, and stages. And for a couple of weeks, the townspeople come to the carnival. At the carnival, the people can enjoy all the rides and shows for a while, but then after a week or two, the carnival packs up and goes to the next town.

At the carnival there will be those who pretend they are cowboys or clowns, and do many tricks to attract attention. But once everything gets packed into the big trucks, everyone has to return to the reality of their day-to-day lives.

Our physical body is like the carnival. And the physical world is like the town the carnival comes to for a while. With the physical body, we can pretend to be someone we aren't. We can act out our desires. We can become a boss, become wealthy, become famous, drive a fancy car, and have others respect us. We can play out our fantasies to the degree our past allows.

For a while, that is - until our body dies. Then the charade is over. Then the whole façade fades away. All our accumulated wealth, our name, our possessions - they are all gone in a flash. Whatever position we held is finished. In other words, like the carnival, the physical world only has the illusion of permanence.

But the physical world is not that simple. We can't just do exactly what we want. Everything has a price. We must work hard, and make sacrifices to achieve positions of fame, power, wealth or influence. They are not free. There is a price for everything in this physical world. And to achieve status in the physical world often means sacrificing our quest for spiritual growth. 

What are the consequences?

There is also a consequence for everything we do in the physical world. Whether we help someone or hurt someone, we get returned to us what we put out. Whether it takes a lifetime or multiple lifetimes to have the consequences returned, every action eventually has its reaction.

These are the laws of the physical world because God also designed the physical world to teach us. He wants us to evolve, and learn who we really are, and what will make us ultimately happy. This is because He loves us.

Here we learn that being admired by others, being respected, having wealth and power - will not make us happy. Even with all these things, we are still empty inside. Yet when we help others, when we are merciful to others, when we love others, and when we serve others, we get a glimpse of happiness. This is because serving is part of our natural identity, and this world is set up to teach us this - if we choose to learn it.

The ultimate happiness is to return to our natural position as God's loving servant. While the physical world is ultimately set up to teach us that we are servants, we will still never be forced to become God's loving servants. In fact, quite the contrary. For those who begin the path towards resuming their position as God's loving servant, the mechanisms of the physical world tempt us and test us even harder.

Why? This is God's way of making sure that we really want to return to Him. He isn't looking for a convenient decision. He is looking for us to commit ourselves.

Is there another world?

Yes. The spiritual world is quite the opposite place from the physical world. While we in the physical world are each trying to be the greatest, those inhabitants of the spiritual world are trying to give more and more of themselves. They want to be servants. They want to give themselves to God and God's associates. They each see themselves as the lowest and God as the greatest, and other children of God as greater than themselves.

This is the consciousness that pervades the spiritual world - the consciousness that brings complete fulfillment. No one is empty in the spiritual world - as we are here in the physical world. Here, even the most wealthy, powerful and well-respected of us who are not loving and serving God are empty within.

So Jesus is showing his followers what kind of consciousness they need to develop in order to return to the spiritual realm. He is trying to show them that the mechanisms of God's physical universe will eventually humble those who believe they are great. He is trying to shortcut his followers' learning by giving them the knowledge whereby they can have a change of consciousness without having to go through decades - even lifetimes - of learning before they can return to their homes in the spiritual world.

This is how Jesus can save us: by his teachings. And what was his greatest teaching?
“ ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment.” (Matthew 22:37-38)

“You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel.” (Matthew 23:23-24)

“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You give a tenth of your spices—mint, dill and cummin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law—justice, mercy and faithfulness. You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former. You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel.” (Matthew 23:23-24)

What does 'strain out a gnat but swallow a camel' mean?

The word "strain" is taken from the Greek word τυφλός (typhlos), which means to "filter through" or "pour through a filter" or "strain out."

For example, if some water contained a gnat, the gnat could be removed by pouring the water through a mesh cloth or other type of filter. That would also simply be called, "straining."

Meanwhile, "swallow" comes from the Greek word καταπίνω (katapinō), which means to "to drink down, swallow down."

Obviously, a gnat is much smaller than a camel. So what does the gnat represent and what does the camel represent?

The topic relates to tolerance. During Jesus' times, people would strain water or other drinkables through filters before they would drink it. This was done to remove out the bugs and other impurities. So Jesus is speaking of them filtering out a small thing while they were willing to "swallow" a big giant thing.

In other words, they were intolerant towards a small issue but didn't care about the bigger issue.

The gnat represents a tiny thing - a thing that is not very important. Jesus is speaking of the rituals they followed and the relative importance of following those rituals. These rituals were small in comparison to the bigger issue - compared to the camel - of loving and serving the Supreme Being - and holding fast to Him.

The issue of filtering or swallowing relates to focus. Straining the gnat means they were focused on the tiny things such as the rules and rituals - while ignoring the main thrust of Moses' teachings - loving and serving the Supreme Being and others.

While they were so focused upon enforcing (straining) their rules and rituals, they were missing (swallowing) the intent of Moses' teachings - love of God.

What are 'blind guides'?

The word "blind" comes from the Greek word τυφλός (typhlos), which can mean either physically blind or mentally blind. Jesus was not saying they were physically blind. Certainly, they weren't all without eyesight. He was saying that while they were supposedly teaching others and being an example to others, they were not seeing or teaching the Truth.

Jesus is saying that they were blind to the essential elements of devotion to God.

Jesus is criticizing the Pharisees and scribes because of their lack of compassion and mercy towards others, yet they demanded others strictly practice all the various rituals. He is describing the hypocrisy of their demands to rigidly follow rituals while missing the substance of the teachings of the Prophets.

The high priests and judges of the institutional temples followed many rituals, including tithing. Jesus is not condemning those rituals. Rather, he is stating that the focus should be on helping others to come to know and love the Supreme Being.

What is a 'tenth of your spices—mint, dill and cumin'?

This statement by Jesus means these institutional priests and Pharisees were giving tithings in the form of ten percent of their production of culinary herbs grown in their gardens.

An ancient practice, tithing is the donation of part of one's wealth towards the service of the Supreme Being. In the Old Testament this goes back as far as Abraham:
Then Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine. He was priest of God Most High, and he blessed Abram, saying, "Blessed be Abram by God Most High, Creator of heaven and earth. And praise be to God Most High, who delivered your enemies into your hand." Then Abram gave him a tenth of everything. (Genesis 14:18-20)
We see here that Abraham accepted Melchizedek as his spiritual teacher (he blessed Abram) and then gave him a tenth of his possessions.

Jesus understood the purpose behind such a practice. As taught by Abraham and then Moses, the goal of these practices is to please the Supreme Being and come to know, love, and serve Him. This was stated clearly by Moses:
"Love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength." (Deut. 6:5)

"Love the LORD your God and keep His requirements, His decrees, His laws and His commands always." (Deut. 11:1)

"So if you faithfully obey the commands I am giving you today—to love the LORD your God and to serve Him with all your heart and with all your soul—" (Deut. 11:13)

"If you carefully observe all these commands I am giving you to follow—to love the LORD your God, to walk in obedience to Him and to hold fast to Him—" (Deut. 11:22)

"... because you carefully follow all these laws I command you today—to love the LORD your God and to walk always in obedience to Him—" (Deut. 19:9)

"For I command you today to love the LORD your God, to walk in obedience to him, and to keep His commands, decrees and laws; then..." (Deut. 30:16)

"... and that you may love the LORD your God, listen to His voice, and hold fast to Him. For the LORD is your life..." (Deut. 30:20)
These verses indicate that love of God was the foundation of Moses' instructions to his followers. Loving the Supreme Being - holding fast to Him - is the basis for following the other commandments Moses gave, some of which were being enforced by the institutional priests and Pharisees.

What are 'the more important matters of the law'?

Jesus is commenting on the foundation of "the law" - translated from the Greek word νόμος (nomos), which means "anything established, anything received by usage, a custom, a law, a command."

Love for God is the foundation of law, as indicated by the Greek word πίστις (pistis) - being translated here to "faithfulness." The word means, according to the lexicon, "conviction of the truth of anything." In the context of Jesus' statement, he is referring to Moses' underlying instructions to love and serve the Supreme Being and "hold fast to Him."

The other components - "justice" and "mercy" relate to how the priests treated the followers of the institutional temples. They did not treat them with fairness, nor with compassion - the basis for the Greek words κρίσις (krisis) and ἔλεος (eleos).

In other words, they were not fair or compassionate. They unfairly punished those who did not follow all the rituals.

What does 'the latter, without neglecting the former' mean?

We see here that Jesus was not condemning the giving of tithings. The phrase, "without neglecting the former" refers to the tithings, while "the latter" refers to being fair and compassionate to others, as well as holding fast to the Supreme Being.
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law of the Prophets ..." (Matthew 5:17-20)
In the same way, these institutional teachers were ignoring this central component of Moses' teachings, many of today's sectarian institutions and their teachers are missing the focus of Jesus' teachings. And consistent with the Pharisees and chief priests, they are also focusing on the prestige of their respective positions and their various ritualistic ceremonies.

In this way, the gnats continue to be strained as the camel continues to be swallowed.

And just as the teachings of Moses were clear, Jesus' teachings were also very clear:
"'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment." (Matthew 22:37-38)

“When the son of man comes in His glory, and all the angels ...” (Matthew 25:31-46)

“When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, He will sit on His throne in heavenly glory. All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left. Then the king will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after  me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’ Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’ The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.’ Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’ They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’ He will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.” (Matthew 25:31-46)

Jesus 'comes'?

The key to Jesus' statement is the word "comes," which is derived from the Greek word ἔρχομαι (erchomai), which can mean, when used in the physical sense, "to come from one place to another, and used both of persons arriving and of those returning," according to the lexicon.

But when used in the context of Jesus's previous statements and analogies - the events immediately following the moment of death, the lexicon describes the word to mean, "to appear, make one's appearance," as well as "to arise."

Furthermore, when used metaphorically - as Jesus was - the word actually means, "to come into being, arise, come forth, show itself, find place or influence" and "be established, become known, to come (fall) into or unto."

This, with the rest of Jesus' statement, indicates that Jesus is speaking of presence. Being there. Whether he is referring to his being there for his followers as they deal with the challenges of their physical lives, or accompanies them in the spiritual realm. He is speaking of his being there for his followers, at any time.

After all, if a person were "coming," they would not be sitting on a throne, because thrones are not considered moving vehicles. Rather, Jesus is describing his presence in the spiritual realm - and in our hearts as we follow his teachings.

Son of man in the third person?

Another important component is the fact that Jesus is speaking of "Son of Man" in the third person. He is not saying "I" or "me" here. Why not?

This indicates that Jesus was not speaking exclusively of himself. He is referring to himself within a role - a role that others have had.

This might be compared to how someone might refer to a military rank. For example, a military officer might state, "when the lieutenant is present, lower ranks must salute." The officer could be referring to himself if he is a lieutenant, but he would also be referring to the role as a lieutenant because others also hold the rank of lieutenant.

This would also apply to the role of "Son of Man" - if that is the correct translation. What does "Son of Man" mean anyway? Every human male is a son of a man.

Actually, "Son of Man" would not be the best translation in this context of the Greek phrase, υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου.

The word "son" is being translated from the Greek word υἱός (huios). This can only mean "son" when the discussion is in the context of a physical family. When used outside this context, the word means, "one of the posterity of any one," and "used to describe one who depends on another or is his follower." This describes someone who is serving another - an intimate servant.

Furthermore, the word translated to "man" is ἄνθρωπος (anthrōpos), which can mean either "humanity" or "mankind."

Thus we have the more appropriate translation - "servant of humanity."

This is precisely how Jesus saw himself, and he wanted his disciples to also take up this role. Why? Because he was teaching about the Supreme Being - a true service to humanity. Consider, for example, this statement by Jesus:
"Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be your slave—just as the Son of Man [servant of humanity] did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many." (Matthew 20:26-28)
We see by this statement by Jesus that he saw himself as a servant to humanity, and he wanted his disciples to also become servants to humanity.

The reason Jesus speaks of the "Son of Man" [servant of humanity] in the third person throughout his teachings:

Because the "Son of Man" [servant of humanity] is a role - a role that was not exclusive to Jesus. Jesus wanted all his disciples to become servants of humanity, and thus work to saving others.

An exalted servant?

Jesus is clarifying his glory as being God's messenger and representative.

But as we see in the scriptures, God's messengers all teach love of God. They all teach giving our lives to the Supreme Being as the only means for becoming fulfilled. This is why Jesus often quoted Moses, David, Isaiah, and others in his teachings. Because he was passing on the same teachings ultimately coming from the same person - the Supreme Person.

This all means that we can more appropriately translate the first phrase of Jesus statement above to:

What does 'His glory' mean?

Whose 'glory' are we speaking of here? We are speaking of the Supreme Being's glory. Actually, the word δόξα (doxa) refers to "magnificence, excellence, preeminence, dignity, grace" according to the lexicon.

These are the traits of the Supreme Being. While the "servant of humanity" is certainly glorious and magnificent, what makes them this way is their loving relationship with the Supreme Being. Therefore, we can understand that the "glory or magnificence" Jesus is referring to being present with is the glory or magnificence of the Supreme Being.

In fact, the entire discussion relating to the "angels with Him" and "He will sit on His throne in heavenly glory" along with the rest are referring to the Supreme Being.

This is confirmed by the statement:

"‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father ..."

In other words, ecclesiastical sectarian translators that have thoroughly forgotten the very person that Jesus came to introduce us to - the Supreme Being - over the centuries have twisted Jesus' words to somehow mean that Jesus is pumping himself up as the big man sitting on the throne, dividing the nations and doing all the things that belong to the Supreme Being.

Jesus did not see himself, nor did he teach that he was this person. Rather, he saw himself as a messenger. As a servant. Here is the proof:
“My teaching is not my own. It comes from the One who sent me." (John 7:16)

"For I did not speak on my own, but the Father who sent me commanded me to say all that I have spoken." (John 12:49)

"For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of Him who sent me." (John 6:38)
These and many other verses describe Jesus as being God's servant - and having been sent by the Supreme Being. Furthermore, he is saying that his teachings are not his but are coming from the Supreme Being.

This is what a messenger does. A messenger delivers a message. Jesus was "sent" to deliver a message.

What role is Jesus suggesting?

We see Jesus describing the "Son of Man" [servant of humanity] taking the role of every person who is distraught, sick, and destitute, and those who come to the aid of anyone who is in this position as coming to the aid of the servant of humanity. Why is this?

Because the servant of humanity has been sent by the Supreme Being to retrieve those who are distraught, sick, and destitute. God wants us to return to our relationship with Him.

But why the distraught, sick and destitute? Because only those who are tired of chasing the flickering dreams of the physical world are ready to receive God's invitation.

Jesus is using distraught, sick, and destitute people in a metaphorical sense here. When a person gives up their dreams that this illusory world will make us happy, they have become destitute in another sense: They are ready to receive God's teachings because they have become humble. They have come to accept that they are not the big champions or winners in life. They are accepting that life is empty and lonely - which it is without our relationship with the Supreme Being.

Thus, anyone who comes to the aid of such a destitute person - by encouraging them to seek refuge in the Supreme Being - this person is welcomed back to the spiritual realm.

This is why Jesus' two most important instructions were:
“‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments." (Matt. 22:37-40)
With these points in mind, consider the above verses as translated from the Lost Gospels of Jesus:
"But when the Servant of Humanity shall appear with His majesty – and all the holy angels with him – he will be sitting upon a throne of His majesty, and before him will be gathered all the people, and he will separate one from the other just as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. And he shall place the sheep on his right side, and the goats on his left. Then the prince will say to them on his right side, ‘Come, you blessed by my LORD – take your inheritance, the sanctuary prepared for you from the beginning of creation. For I was hungry and you gave me food; I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink; I was a stranger and you took me in: I was naked – and you clothed me; I was ill and you visited me; I was in prison and you came to me.’ Then the devoted will answer him, saying, ‘Master, when did we see you hungry and fed you? And gave you something to drink? When did we see a stranger that we took in? Or naked, and clothed? Or when did we see you sick, or in prison and came to you?’ And the prince will declare to them, ‘Truly I say to you, whatever you have done to the least of my brothers, you have done to me.’ Then he will say to those on the left side, ‘Get away from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the wicked and its messengers – because I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat; I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink; I was a stranger and you didn’t take me in; I was naked and you didn’t clothe me; I was sick in prison, and you didn’t visit me.’ Then they will also answer him, saying, ‘Master, when did we see you hungry, or thirsty, or as a stranger, or naked, or sick or in prison, and did not assist you?’ Then he will answer them, saying, ‘Truly I say to you, whatever you didn’t do for the least of these, you did not do for me.’ And they shall go away into everlasting rehabilitation – but the devoted, into life everlasting.” (Matthew 25:31-46 Lost Gospels)

"The Son of Man will go just as it is written about him ..." (Matthew 26:24)

"The Son of Man will go just as it is written about him. But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man! It would be better for him if he had not been born." (Matthew 26:24)

Why is Jesus referring to himself in the third person?

In the verse before this the NIV translation states that Jesus said:
"The one who has dipped his hand into the bowl with me will betray me." (Matthew 26:23)
Comparing that statement with the next one (Matt. 26:24), notice that Jesus changes from speaking in the first person to speaking in the third person.

In the first sentence (Matt. 26:23) he refers to "me," and now he refers to the "Son of Man" and "him" in the third person, almost as if he is speaking about someone else. What is going on here?

This would be akin to someone sitting down at the dinner table and saying "can you please pass the peas to the person sitting in the end seat - he is hungry." That would be very odd if the person saying this was sitting in the end seat. In that case, the normal thing for the person at the dinner table to say is simply, "please pass me the peas - I am hungry."

So what do we make of Jesus' sudden change from speaking of himself in the first person to suddenly speaking of himself in the third person?

In fact, we find that Jesus spoke in the third person in practically every statement where Jesus refers to the "Son of Man." 

Why only when Jesus makes this reference does he switch to the third person? The answer lies in the true meaning of "Son of Man."

What does 'Son of Man' mean?

Read Jesus' statement carefully... "...woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man..." Here "man" and "Son of Man" are being used in the same sentence. Does it even make sense? Every male human is a son of a man. Why would it be so bad for a "man" to betray a "Son of Man"? What is a "Son of Man" anyway?

The phrase "Son of Man" is a mistranslation. "Son of Man" is translated from the Greek phrase, υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου. The first word, υἱὸν can indicate a relationship of offspring within the context of a physical family, but Jesus is not referencing a physical family: If he were, he'd be referencing a physical father.

Rather, the appropriate meaning of υἱὸν in this context, according to the Greek lexicon is "one of the posterity of any one" and "one who depends on another or is his follower." Thus, the appropriate translation of υἱὸν can be boiled down to either "follower," dependent, "disciple," or "servant." 

In this context - relating to man or mankind - the most appropriate choice is "servant."

The Greek word τοῦ indicates possessive, and is appropriately translated to "of".

The Greek word, ἀνθρώπου can be translated to "man" as well as "mankind" or "humanity" according to the lexicon. "Mankind" or "humanity" is most appropriate within the context.

Thus, the appropriate translation of υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου: Servant of humanity

This is consistent with Jesus' other statements elsewhere that he has come as a service to all of humanity. This humble identification of himself is also consistent with how Jesus spoke of being sent by God:
"I am with you for only a short time, and then I go to the One who sent me." (John 7:33)
Jesus also spoke of himself as a servant to others, and he also instructed his disciples to serve others:
"Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant." (Mark 10:43)
Jesus also illustrated this sense of service as he washed his disciples' feet.

Is 'Son of Man' a role?

Evidence that this is a role rather than an individual exists clearly in the Old Testament. This humble self-reference as the servant of humanity was not limited to Jesus. Other messengers of God also referred to themselves in this same way:
"O Lord, what is man that you care for him, the Son of Man [servant of humanity] that you think of him?" (Psalm 144:3)
While some have tried to misinterpret David's statement as referring to Jesus, the verses surrounding this make it obvious that David is referring to himself as the servant of humanity - pleading humbly as to why God would even consider him.

Job also humbly referred to himself as a servant of humanity when he prayed:
"how much less man, who is but a maggot - a Son of Man [servant of humanity], who is only a worm!" (Job 25:6)
God also referred to Ezekiel as the servant of humanity:
"He said to me, "Son of Man [servant of humanity], stand up on your feet and I will speak to you."" (Ezekiel 2:1)
and
"He [God] said: "Son of man [servant of humanity}, I am sending you to the Israelites, to a rebellious nation that has rebelled against Me; they and their fathers have been in revolt against Me to this very day." (Ezekiel 2:3)
In this last verse, we see that God referred to Ezekiel as the servant of humanity as He was sending him to teach to the Israelites on His behalf. This is the quintessential servant of humanity: Sent by God to help (as a service to) humankind.

So Jesus is referring to himself here, not as "me" but as someone sent by God. One of God's messengers, who has come to save humanity by teaching God's message.

This is why Jesus speaks of himself in the third person as he makes this reference as the servant of humanity: Because he recognized its scriptural context - as a role rather than a specific person.

We might compare this to being a first mate on a ship. The first mate has a specific job to do, and this job is defined by the captain. If one of the ship-mates were to disobey the commands of the first mate, the first mate would not say, "you should never disobey me." This would sound very arrogant and not appropriate. Rather, the first mate would say, "you should never disobey the first mate." While the first mate would still be referencing himself when he says this, he is subordinating himself within his role, and speaking of his role rather than himself personally.

This is exactly what is going on with Jesus' statement above. He is subordinating himself to his role as God's representative, who has come to save humanity.

What is God's representative?

This is akin to the situation of a visiting ambassador to a foreign country. If anyone within the foreign government mistreats the ambassador, it might be a personal affront against the ambassador himself, but the bigger problem is that the mistreatment is an offense against the government the ambassador represents. This is due to the fact that the ambassador is not there on his own. He is a representative of his government and leader of that government.

In the same way, because Jesus was sent by God and is God's representative, to betray him is to offend God. It is a most egregious offense, as Jesus indicates.

Jesus also refers to himself in the third person as he says "The Son of Man [servant of humanity] will go just as it is written about him." Jesus is pointing again to the fact that he is serving God within a particular role, and he knows he will be persecuted for his service to God.

Jesus realizes that this is part of his service, as was written because he took on this role of being sent by God to serve humankind by teaching us about God, and how to serve God:
“‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment." (Matt. 22:37-38)

"Take and eat; this is my body." (Matthew 26:26)

While they were eating, Jesus took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body." (Matthew 26:26)

Did Jesus want them to eat his body?

Jesus is sitting down with some of his followers at what is popularly known as the "last supper." He is surrounded by his disciples, and he is passing out the bread.

Yet we know from Jesus' statement that the bread that Jesus broke and handed out to his disciples was not ordinary bread. What did Jesus do to the bread to make it so special?
While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks ... (Matthew 26:26)
This means that giving thanks was a critical event that took place during this meal.

The Greek verse is clear that they were already eating when Jesus took the bread. The Greek word is ἐσθίω (esthiō), and this communicates they were already eating. The translation appropriately says:
"While they were eating...."
Then the verse says Jesus "took the bread." "Took" here is being translated from λαμβάνω (lambanō) which means, according to the lexicon, 'to take with the hand,' or 'lay hold of.' This means that Jesus reached over and took the bread into his hands.

After he took the bread into his hands, the English translation says:
"he gave thanks...."

Did he really 'give thanks'?

Not exactly. The Greek word being translated into "gave thanks" is εὐλογέω (eulogeō). This means, according to the lexicon:
1) to praise, celebrate with praises
2) to invoke blessings
3) to consecrate a thing with solemn prayers
a) to ask God's blessing on a thing
b) pray God to bless it to one's use
c) pronounce a consecratory blessing on

Where, in this definition does it say εὐλογέω means to give thanks?

To "give thanks," as some suggest, is to say something like, "Thank you Lord for the food we have before us..." This is usually followed by "....and [all the other things] You have given us..."

This is usually extended with a listing of the various things the person is thankful for, such as a family, a good job, or money, or some kind of award received.

It is certainly nice to thank God for everything received. But such prayers lead to the premise that it is God's job to deliver the stuff we ask for, and our job is to graciously receive it all and thank Him for it.

This assumes a relationship between us and God (or Jesus, as many preach) that God (or Jesus) is our servant. He is there to give us whatever we want, as long as we ask for it with prayer. This assumption is diametrically opposed to Jesus' teachings.

As we apply Jesus' teaching about loving God and doing the will of God, another element emerges. This allows us to appropriately understand what Jesus was doing with the bread, as he εὐλογέω (eulogeō) with it:

Jesus was offering the bread to God.

Offering food and gifts to God while praising Him had been a long-cherished method of worshiping God - one that had been handed down from teacher to teacher for thousands of years. It was practiced by Abraham, Moses, Joshua, David, Samuel, Solomon, Eli, and all the other teachers that formed the lineage that Jesus was a part of:
"There he [Abraham] built an altar to the LORD and called on the Name of the LORD." (Genesis 12:8)
All the Israelite men and women who were willing brought to the LORD freewill offerings.... (Exodus 35:29)
"The rest of the grain offering belongs to Aaron and his sons; it is a most holy part of the offerings made to the LORD by fire." (Lev. 2:3)
And what was the purpose of these offerings? The purpose of making offerings to God - "fellowship offerings" or "freewill offerings" as they are called in the Old Testament - is to establish a relationship with God.

Or do we think that Jesus would honor the Prophets and quote many of their teachings yet abandon the venerated process of making offerings to God?

So what did Jesus mean by 'this is my body'?

At this 'last supper' with his disciples, Jesus first made a private personal offering to God with the bread. Then he broke the bread and handed it out to his followers. As he did this, he said, "Take and eat; this is my body."

Was Jesus talking about his physical body? Certainly not, since he was handing out the bread, not his body. His physical body sat in the chair while the bread was being handed out.

This means that there was something about the bread that Jesus connected as his body. What was it?

It was the bread that was offered to God. The bread that was offered symbolized Jesus' offering of himself to God.

The word "body" in this verse is translated from the Greek word, σῶμα (sōma). This can certainly mean body, either practically or virtually. But it can also mean, according to Thayer's lexicon, "the instrument of the soul."

Since the bread was an offering to God, and Jesus is saying the offering is his "instrument," Jesus is suggesting that they consider Jesus' life to be an offering to God.

Jesus was saying to his followers that his life was an offering to God.

What about the communion ritual?

Today we find some institutions conduct a ritual where a cracker or piece of bread is put in the mouth of each person while a prayer is read.

Practitioners believe this ritual provides purification. Certainly, they are not literally eating Jesus' body. Rather, the ritual should theoretically commemorate the idea that Jesus had offered himself to God.

Was Jesus doing some mystical ritual so that his disciples would be purified of their sins once they ate the bread? Rather, Jesus was teaching them by example how to live their lives. And doing so would naturally lead to their purification - a change of heart.

Jesus was teaching them with metaphorical terms. He was connecting the offered food with his body because he was suggesting metaphorically that his whole life - his teachings, his example and his miracles - were all offerings to God. And he was handing out that bread to symbolize that they could partake in that offering by following his example.

In other words, Jesus was saying that he considered his very life to be an offering to God, and they could too. This is why Jesus also taught:
"For it is written: 'Worship the Lord your God, and serve Him only.'" (Luke 4:8 and Matt. 4:10)

"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven." (Matt. 7:21)

"For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother." (Matt 12:50)

"For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of Him who sent me." (John 6:38)
This is also evidenced by what occurred a few days later, as Jesus laid down the life of his physical body as an offering to the Supreme Being. Jesus was illustrating, by not resisting being arrested, and by allowing his body to be murdered because of his teachings, that Jesus was God's servant and Jesus' life was an offering to God.

And yes, realizing this has the ability to save us. Not with some kind of magical "eating of the body of Christ" ritual, but from the simple realization that Jesus was trying to teach us to love God with all our hearts, all our minds - our whole life and being.

This is evidenced by the real teachings of Jesus, specifically his most important one:
“‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment." (Matthew 22:37-38)

"The spirit is willing, but the body is weak." (Matthew 26:40-41)

Then he returned to his disciples and found them sleeping. "Couldn't you men keep watch with me for one hour?" he asked Peter. "Watch and pray so that you will not fall into temptation. The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak." (Matthew 26:40-41)

Why did Jesus say this?

Jesus said this to Peter, James and John after his first prayer at Gethsemane.

Jesus was making two important points here. The first is that his disciples had not followed his instruction. Jesus had requested that Peter, John and James keep watch, as he was expecting to be arrested shortly:
"Stay here and keep watch with me." (Matthew 26:38)
In the first part of Matthew 26:40 above, Jesus is chastising some of his disciples for not following his instructions to watch out for him while he prayed.

The second part of this statement indicates a core element of Jesus' teachings. Jesus clearly taught the  distinction between the spiritual person (soul or spirit-person) and the physical body:

What does 'the spirit is willing' mean?

Who is Jesus referring to as the "spirit"? We can see here that the "spirit" has a will - "is willing." Only a person can have a will, and thus we can conclude that the "spirit" Jesus refers to is the person within.

The word "spirit" is being translated from the Greek word πνεῦμα (pneuma). According to the lexicon, this means, "the vital principal by which the body is animated." as well as "a life giving spirit," and "the soul."

Many refer to the soul as a part of a person - like an organ or something. Others will refer to the soul as one's morality.

Here we can see that Jesus' use of the word "spirit" does not relate to a part of a person or one's morality. Jesus is referring to "spirit" as the individual spiritual person: Again, only an individual person (spirit) can have a will.

This all means that Jesus' statement is suggesting that his spirit-person within can make a determination. But within the physical world, there are other factors to contend with.

What does 'the body is weak' mean?

The verse states Jesus said, "but the body is weak." This is a slight mistranslation because the Greek word being translated to "body" is σάρξ (sarx) means "flesh (the soft substance of the living body, which covers the bones and is permeated with blood) of both man and beasts." Without the parenthesis: "flesh of both man and beasts."

More importantly, the word also means, again according to the lexicon, "the sensuous nature of man, "the animal nature"" and "the animal nature with cravings which incite to sin."

We can see from these definitions that the word "body" falls short of capturing the real meaning of Jesus' statement. He was saying that while the spiritual person might be willing to do something, the animal-type cravings inherent in the physical body can pull the person to act otherwise.

Why is the body 'weak'?

How can we be willing to do something, yet be driven to do something else by virtue of our physical body and its inherent "cravings"? Many characterize this as "the devil," as in: "the devil made me do it." This is often conjured as having a little devil on our shoulders, who is constantly tempting us.

The answer lies within the reason for our occupation of a physical body in the first place.

Each of us is a spirit-person created by the Supreme Being to share the spiritual realm with Him as one of His caregivers. He wanted to share loving relationships with us. But real love requires freedom, so God gave us the freedom to love Him or not. He gave us the choice to engage in a relationship with Him or not.

Exercising that choice means that we need to be presented with the opportunity to choose otherwise. Without the choice to choose otherwise, we would not have the freedom to choose to engage in our relationship with God.

The physical world offers us the opportunities to choose otherwise in a myriad of different ways. Here we get to follow God or deny God. Here we get to help others or harm others. Here we get to chase self-centered dreams or try to help those who are less fortunate.

We have this myriad of choices in order to not only choose, but also to learn. This world of choice was also designed to help us grow and evolve through the consequences of our behavior.

This is why, for example, those who commit illegal acts will typically pay the price through jail or otherwise. And for those who get away with their crimes, their consequences will come later, likely in the next life.

This also explains why some children are born into starvation or other challenging situations. They may be suffering the consequences for the activities of a previous lifetime.

To graduate from this world of choice and consequence means to evolve to a point where we are ready to assume our innate spiritual nature in the spiritual realm. The highest realm of the spiritual world is full of love without self-centeredness.

But those of us who are still dealing with self-centeredness are relocated by taking on physical bodies within the physical world, a virtual world where we take on a new identity with every incarnation.

Since we are spiritual by nature, relocation requires a virtual existence. One where we could take on a role different than our real nature. In order to take on a self-centered existence, we need a virtual personality - because our true nature is loving and selfless.

So the Supreme Being designed a virtual universe where we could occupy temporary physical bodies and play temporary roles, in order to exercise our freedom of choice and our self-centeredness, and learn lessons through consequences.

We might compare this to a play, where the actors put on costumes and play roles different than their "real" roles.

To complete the analogy, our "costumes" are these physical bodies.

We know these physical bodies are temporary and we are playing temporary roles in them because our bodies keep changing and our roles keep changing - yet each of us is still the same person within. When our body is young, we play the role of a child. When our body grows older, we play the role of a teenager. Later we play the role of an adult, with a job and family. Then later we play the role of a senior citizen.

Each of us is distinct from the roles we play in the physical world. These roles are required by the society and culture of the physical world. 

This doesn't mean that we have to identify with these roles, however. We can know that when our physical body dies, our roles in this world will die with it.

Why does the body not satisfy us?

The physical body is a temporary vehicle for the living being. Each of us is driving our physical body much like a person would drive a car. And as most of us have experienced, when we are driving a car we begin to identify with it.

We also begin to identify the other drivers on the road with their cars. When we are passed on the highway by a speeder in a red car, we will say, "that red car is speeding." We are thus identifying the driver as their car.

In the same way, after a short time within these physical bodies, we begin to identify with them. This is the design of the physical world, as programmed by the Supreme Being.

As we identify with these physical bodies, we also seek our happiness through them. We begin to think that our happiness revolves around whether the body feels good. This is also designed by the Supreme Being.

The body is designed to release neurotransmitters called dopamine, serotonin and endorphins, which signal to our brain that something is good for the body. Eating something sweet or having a sexual orgasm, for example, will cause the brain to release these "feel good" chemicals. These "feel good" chemicals trick us - the spirit-person within - into thinking we become happy when the nerves are saturated with one or more of these "feel good" neurotransmitters.

Yet no one actually becomes happier when the body is saturated with these neurotransmitters. The sensation might feel good to our body, but the spiritual person within is not satisfied.

This might be likened to a car driver feeling hungry and thinking that if he filled his car's tank with gas the driver would not feel hungry anymore. No. The car's gas tank gets filled up, but the driver's stomach is not touched by the gas. The driver will still feel hungry, even when the gas tank is full.

It is the same with the spirit-person driving the physical body. The reason that so many people living in the physical world are unhappy - even those with great wealth and all the sweet foods and sexual organisms they could ever want - is because we are spiritual in essence, not physical.

And this is what Jesus is trying to teach his students. His students' bodies may feel more comfortable sleeping, but their spirit-persons will only be satisfied when they are fixed within their real identity - being one of the Supreme Being's loving servants.

The Supreme Being wants us back. He wants us to return to His loving arms. This is why Jesus' most important teaching was:
"'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment." (Matt. 22:37-38)

"From now on you will see the Son of Man sitting ..." (Matthew 26:64)

"But I say to all of you: From now on you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven." (Matthew 26:54)

What does 'sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One' mean?

Here Jesus is continuing to answer to those Temple chief priests who had Jesus arrested. They have been questioning him as to his position and authority.

Jesus was not saying that he will literally sit at the right side of God - as though the Supreme Being is always just sitting around on a throne all day.

This expression "right hand" is translated from the Greek word δεξιός (dexios). This Greek term can mean "right hand," but also, "a place of honor or authority," referring to the honor given by a person in the servitude position.

This terminology has continued to some degree into modern English. To "sit at someone's right hand" means to directly serve that person. It means to carry out their wishes. Nowadays, the head of a company or institution might call someone who is committed to them and carries out their orders as "my right-hand person."

And when that head of company or institution is away, the "right hand" person is typically given authority to represent that head of company or institution.

In this context, Jesus is saying that he will assume his position of being the right hand of God. That means he is God's devoted servant.

Jesus is stating clearly that this is his role. He is God's trusted servant and His representative. Jesus is carrying out God's wishes.

Why does Jesus refer to the 'Son of Man' in the third person?

One might then ask, wasn't Jesus being self-righteous as he called himself "Son of Man" and spoke that he would sit at the right hand of God?

Actually, it is quite the opposite. First, "Son of Man" is a mistranslation in this context. What is a "Son of Man" anyway? Every male is a son of a man. So this has no real meaning translated as such.

Rather, "Son of Man" is being translated from the Greek phrase υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου. The first Greek word, υἱὸν, can indicate an offspring relationship within the context of a physical family, but Jesus is not referencing a physical family here - otherwise, he would be referring to his physical father.

The appropriate translation of υἱὸν in this context, according to the Greek lexicon, relates to "one of the posterity of any one" and "one who depends on another or is his follower." Thus, υἱὸν can be boiled down to either "follower," dependent, "disciple," or "servant." In other words, it is a humble, self-deprecating statement relating to devotional servitude.

The Greek word τοῦ indicates possessive, and is appropriately translated to "of".

The Greek word, ἀνθρώπου can be translated to "man" as well as "mankind" or "humanity" according to the lexicon. "Mankind" or "humanity" is most appropriate within the context.

Thus, the more appropriate translation of υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπουm would be: Servant of humanity. One could also translate this to Servant of the people.

This is consistent with Jesus' other statements elsewhere that he has come as a service to all of humanity. Jesus also spoke of himself as a servant to others, and he also instructed his disciples to serve others:
"Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant." (Mark 10:43)
This humble self-reference as the servant of humanity was not limited to Jesus. Other messengers of God also referred to themselves in this same way:
"O Lord, what is man that you care for him, the Son of Man [servant of humanity] that you think of him?" (Psalm 144:3)
While some have tried to misinterpret David's statement as referring to Jesus, the verses surrounding this make it obvious that David is referring to himself as the servant of humanity - pleading humbly as to why God would even consider him.

Job also humbly referred to himself as a servant of humanity when he prayed:
"how much less man, who is but a maggot - a Son of Man [servant of humanity], who is only a worm!" (Job 25:6)
God also referred to Ezekiel as the servant of humanity over 60 times, with statements such as:
"He said to me, "Son of Man [servant of humanity], stand up on your feet and I will speak to you."" (Ezekiel 2:1)
and
"He [God] said: "Son of man [servant of humanity}, I am sending you to the Israelites, to a rebellious nation that has rebelled against Me; they and their fathers have been in revolt against Me to this very day." (Ezekiel 2:3)
In this last verse, we see that God referred to Ezekiel as the servant of humanity as He was sending him to teach to the Israelites on His behalf. This is the quintessential servant of humanity: Sent by God to help (as a service to) humankind.

Jesus also referred to himself as being sent by the Supreme Being:
"I am with you for only a short time, and then I go to the One who sent me." (John 7:33)
and
"My teaching is not my own. It comes from Him who sent me." (John 7:16)
and many others.

Thus we find within Jesus' answer to the institutional temple priests a true yet humble statement about his position and authority. He didn't consider himself a big powerful high priest out to capture the respect and admiration of others, as were the institutional temple priests. He saw himself simply as a humble loving servant of God and a servant of all people.

Why are they questioning Jesus' authority?

Is Jesus not also a rabbi? Is Jesus not also teaching about God - the same Supreme Being that the institutional temple priests supposedly taught about?

Jesus is condemning these priests because they are not humbly representing or serving God. They were misleading people.

Furthermore, is Jesus not teaching the same teachings taught by Moses, David, and other Jewish Prophets - the very same prophets that the institutional temple chief priests supposedly represented in their teachings?

The problem is that Jesus' teachings threatened their authority. The chief priests were appointed by the institutional temple hierarchy during that time. Jesus was not. Jesus was simply a student and disciple of John the Baptist, who was himself a student and disciple of his teacher, the priest Zachariah.

Because Jesus was not part of their institutional hierarchy - and was an empowered teacher of God, Jesus threatened their authority.

Why did Jesus threaten their authority? Because Jesus was attracting many followers who saw the truth in Jesus' teachings. Jesus was taking followers away from the institutional temples. And this means Jesus was taking their income and followers away.

You see, the institutional temple priests were professional priests. They collected salaries for their positions from the temple organization, and lived in comfortable quarters, all supported by monies brought in from followers - which were not always voluntary:
"Watch out for the teachers of the law. They like to walk around in flowing robes and be greeted in the marketplaces, and have the most important seats in the synagogues and the places of honor at banquets. They devour widows' houses and for a show make lengthy prayers. Such men will be punished most severely." (Mark 12:38-40)
When the man of a household died, the temple priests confiscated the house and belongings of the widow, often leaving the widow homeless.

We can see Jesus' other issues with these professional priests. Their concerns were centered around their reputation. They wanted to be honored and respected. They were not interested in glorifying and serving God. They were interested in their own authority and reputation.

In contrast, Jesus walked the countryside with no home and no income. He survived on whatever was given voluntarily in service, and spent his time glorifying God and teaching about love of God. He had no organization for people to join. They either followed his teachings or they did not.

So in Jesus' answer to these priests, he clarifies his position in relation to the Supreme Being and the spiritual realm.

What does 'coming on the clouds of heaven' mean?

When put together with the concept of "clouds of heaven," how could a person "come" on the "clouds of heaven"? Does this even make sense?

Some sectarian doctrines have envisioned an image of Jesus riding over the clouds, sometimes on horseback.

The word "coming" is being translated from the Greek word ἔρχομαι (erchomai). This word can mean to "come from one place to another." But it also means "to appear, make one's appearance, come before the public" according to the lexicon.

However, when used metaphorically (consistent with Jesus' "right hand" phrase), this term means "to come into being, arise, come forth, show itself, find place or influence."

This might make for good art, but it is not what Jesus is referring to. Today we have airplanes and spaceships that fly through the clouds, and we can see that heaven is not in the clouds. Nor are there people sitting on the clouds or riding over them as imagined by some of these institutions.

Rather, the word "clouds" is being translated from the Greek word νεφέλη (nephelē), which refers to "cloud" as an envelopment or atmosphere.

There must be an understanding of the spiritual realm here. The type of "cloud" Jesus is referring to in "clouds of heaven" refers to the atmosphere of the spiritual realm.

And "coming" is a mistranslation interpreted to insinuate an impending "second coming" together with an apocalypse that scares people to join and remain part of the sect.

Scaring people by warning them of an impending apocalypse has been part of a strategy to manipulate followers over the centuries. Even today, even though none of the apocalypse predictions have come true over the centuries, they still threaten followers with an impending 'end of the world.' 

The bottom line is that Jesus is simply telling them that the next time they see him, they will see him appearing within the environment of the spiritual realm.

Where is heaven?

Just think of what happens when we are in an airplane, and stuck in a cloud. What happens? We become immersed in that cloud. We become enveloped by the cloud. This immersion or envelopment describes those living beings who reside in the spiritual realm. They are enveloped or immersed in the atmosphere of the spiritual realm.

Consider first the requirement to enter heaven:
"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven." (Matthew 7:21)
We can see here clearly that the atmosphere of heaven is love. In that dimension, everyone is loving God and loving all of God's children and associates. The residents of the spiritual realm cherish and love the Supreme Being, and this drives them to please Him and do His will.

Jesus also teaches of another characteristic of heaven:
"Therefore, whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven." (Matthew 18:4)
By this, we can see that humility is also part of the environment of the spiritual realm. Its residents maintain ultimate humility. And this is why Jesus also clarified that the institutional temple priests would not be entering the spiritual realm anytime soon:
"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the kingdom of heaven in men's faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to." (Matthew 23:13)
These statements clearly indicate that getting into heaven has nothing to do with deeds. It is not that there is a "pay it forward" thing going on, where we basically have to pay a fee of doing certain activities or joining a certain club in order to get in.

Jesus is clearly stating above that entering heaven has to do with a state of consciousness. A person who loves others, loves God and wants to please God has a particular consciousness. That consciousness would exist where ever the person was dwelling at the time.

This also assumes that the Supreme Being's "kingdom" is everywhere. For God to be "God" He must have the ultimate authority, and therefore everywhere is His kingdom.

This means that the "kingdom of heaven" or just "heaven" is a state of consciousness, rather than a specific place or location.

Sure, there is a dimension where all residents are loving God and loving all of God's children. But those who love God and love all of God's children also travel outside of that dimension - sometimes, like Jesus - to this planet. Therefore, where ever they go is heaven as well, because they are in heaven all the time, regardless of whether they are here or there.

Such a consciousness is reflected in Jesus' teachings. Just consider Jesus' most important teaching, in which he quoted Moses in Deuteronomy 6:5:
“‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment." (Matthew 22:37-38)